VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

R.Pitchai v. Government of Tamil Nadu

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 January 2025
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP 9353/2019

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Battu Devanand

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to fix the pay of the petitioner consequent on his appointments to the posts of Deputy Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Deputy Collector, District Revenue Officer and sanction annual increments and on that basis revise his pensionary benfits and disburse the arrears thereof with interest for delayed payment, all within a limited time frame, in the interest of justice.

¶2During the course of hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has placed a status report filed by the second respondent and would submit that the relief sought in this writ petition is already granted by the respondents by issuing G.O.(2D) No.62 Revenue and Disaster Management (Ser3(2)) Department dated 30.01.2025 for sanctioning settlement of the amount payable to the petitioner from the cadre of Deputy Tahsildar to Deputy Collector. It is also stated in the status report that the Commissioner of Revenue Administration has ordered in his proceedings No. RA3(2)/02-40/1/2025 dated

30.01.2025 for sanctioning settlement to the petitioner in the cadre of District Revenue Officer Level and settlement bills presented to Pay and Account Office

(East), Chennai for payment.

¶3Learned Additional Government Pleader further submits that, as per the sanction orders, an amount of Rs.1,66,011/- has been credited into the account of the petitioner after making necessary deductions.

¶4Having considered the status report and submissions of the learned Additional Government Pleader, this Court is of the considered view that no further adjudication is required in this writ petition, as already the eligible amounts for all the amount, for which the petitioner is entitled have been paid to the petitioner.

¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed.

¶6However, it is made it clear that the petitioner is at liberty to approach appropriate forum, if he have any further grievance about the quantum of payment made, in accordance with law.

¶7There shall be no order as to costs.

31.01.2025 Index :Yes/No AT

BATTU DEVANAND, J. AT To

1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

31.01.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 31.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND R. Pitchai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, rep., by Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 4.The Accountant General, Chennai – 600 018. ... Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to fix the pay of the petitioner consequent on his appointments to the posts of Deputy Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Deputy Collector and District Revenue Officer, sanction annual increments and on that basis revise his pensionary benfits and disburse the arrears thereof with interest for delayed payment, all within a limited time frame as deemed fit by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. M. Ravi For Respondents : Mr. R. Neelakandan, for R1 to R3 Assisted by Mr. L.S.M. Hasan Fizal, Mr. V. Vijayshankar, for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.