- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 March 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 10314/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.10314, 10318 and 10324 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.11178, 11181, 11186, 11188, 11191 and 11193 of 2026 Tvl.T.K.M.Constructins, (Represented by its Authorised Signatory Krishnan Mohan), No.2/1, Gandhi Nagar, 4th Street, Pudupet Road, Tirupattur, TamilNadu-635601
... Petitioner in all the writ petitions Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Thiruppattur Assessment Circle, No.442, Ward-1, Block-18, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building Ground Floor, Pudupettai Road, Thiruppattur-635601 ... Respondent in W.P.Nos.10314 & 10324/2026 State Tax Officer, Thiruppattur Assessment Circle, No.442, Ward-1, Block-18, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building Ground Floor, Pudupettai Road, Thiruppattur-635601 … Respondent in W.P.No.10318/2026 W.P.No.10314 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating
to
the
Detailed
impugned
order
bearing GSTIN:33AAGFT0719H2ZD/2020-21 dated 19.02.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same and subsequently direct the respondent to provide personal hearing to the petitioner. W.P.No.10318 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating
to
the
Detailed
impugned
order
bearing GSTIN:33AAGFT0719H2ZD/2023-24 dated 08.09.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same and subsequently direct the respondent to provide personal hearing to the petitioner. W.P.No.10324 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating
to
the
Detailed
impugned
order
bearing GSTIN:33AAGFT0719H2ZD/2024-25 dated 28.08.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same and subsequently direct the respondent to provide personal hearing to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Anand For Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate COMMON ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.
¶2With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent, the writ petitions are being disposed of at the time of admission.
¶3In the Writ Petitions, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Orders dated 19.02.2025, 08.09.2025 and 28.08.2025 passed under Section 73 of the respective GST enactments.
¶4By the impugned order, the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notices in DRC-01 dated 26.11.2024, 09.06.2024 and 05.05.2025 have been confirmed, as the petitioner failed to reply to the said show cause notices.
¶5It is noticed that the statutory limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, against the impugned order has already expired long before. However, the present writ petition has been filed only on 11.03.2026.
¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is willing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned orders dated 19.02.2025, 08.09.2025 and 28.08.2025 and therefore, the learned counsel seeks one opportunity for de novo adjudication.
¶7The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle, which is extracted hereunder: " The petitioner is ready to pay 25% tax amount in the impugned order dated 19.02.2025."
¶8Recording the above consent given by the petitioner, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶9Within such time, the petitioner shall also file a reply to the impugned Show Cause Notices dated 26.11.2024, 09.06.2024 and 05.05.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Orders dated 19.02.2025, 08.09.2025 and 28.08.2025 as an addendum to the aforesaid show cause notices.
¶10Subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the respondent shall proceed to pass fresh order on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit.
¶11It is needless to state that, before passing any such order, the petitioner shall be heard.
¶12The attachment of the petitioner's bank account shall also stand automatically raised/vacated, subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations.
¶13It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned order.
¶14In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this writ petition was dismissed in limine today.
C.SARAVANAN, J. sr
¶15The Writ Petitions stand disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
18.03.2026 sr Index:yes/no Website:yes/no To Assistant Commissioner (ST) Thiruppattur Assessment Circle, No.442, Ward-1, Block-18, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building Ground Floor, Pudupettai Road, Thiruppattur-635601 W.P.Nos.10314. 10318 and 10324 of 2026
18.03.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.