- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10485/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 15.07.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 15.07.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 6, notice to the respondents 4 to 6 is dispensed with by this Court.
¶4This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's application.
¶5No prejudice will be caused to the second respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 to 6 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the second respondent is directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 6 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the second respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the second respondent, the concerned Jurisdictional Police shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 26-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To
1.The District Collector District collector office, Ariyalur district
2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Jayamkondam, Udayapalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District
3.The Surveyor Tahsildar office, Jayamkondam, Udayapalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab
26-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Rajasekar Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector District collector office, Ariyalur district 2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Jayamkondam, Udayapalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District 3.The Surveyor Tahsildar office, Jayamkondam, Udayapalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District 4.Lakshmi 5.Murugesan 6.N.Anandhakumar Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct the survey and to ear mark the four boundaries as per petitioner application No. 2025/ 0123/ 17/ 006010 dated 15.07.2025 in respect of the petitioners property in Survey No. 309/11B1 measuring to an extent of 0.17.40 Acres situated at Muthusermadam Revenue Village, Ariyalur district on the basis of considering petitioner representation dated 21.11.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Nirmal Krishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt.Advocate For R1 to R3 ND/W - R4 to R6 -Pvt
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.