VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

E.Kumari v. S. Anierudh

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 August 2026
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
CMA 2519/2026

Judgment

ORDER This appeal has been filed against the Award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in MCOP No.6628 of 2019 dated 10.01.2024, wherein the claimants are seeking for enhancement of compensation.

2.The 1st claimant is the wife, the 2nd claimant is the unmarried daughter and the 3rd claimant is the mother of the deceased Elangovan. The case of the claimant is that on 15.10.2019 at about 07.30 a.m., the deceased was trying to cross the Rajiv Gandhi Salai, and at that point of time, the offending vehicle, which was a two wheeler was driven in a rash and negligent manner and it dashed on the deceased. As a result of which, the deceased sustained fatal injuries and he died on the spot. An FIR came to be registered in Crime No.639 of 2019 against the rider of the two wheeler. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal.

3.The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the rider of the two wheeler.

4.Having rendered the above finding, the Tribunal fixed the total compensation at Rs.21,10,000/- under various heads as follows: Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.) Loss of Income/Dependency 19,50,000 Loss of Estate 15,000 Loss of Consortium 1,20,000 Funeral Expenses 15,000 Transportation Charges 10,000 Total 21,10,000

5.The above compensation was directed to be paid along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.

6.Aggrieved by the same, the claimants have filed the present appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.

7.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

8.The bone of contention is regarding the notional monthly income that was fixed by the Tribunal while fixing the compensation under the head of loss of income/dependency. The accident had taken place during October 2019 and the deceased had left behind his wife, unmarried daughter and his mother. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to fix the notional monthly income at Rs.17,000/-per month. Consequently, the compensation under the head of loss of income/dependency is calculated as follows: Rs.21,250 (Rs.17,000 + Rs.4,250/-(25%)) x 12 x 13 x 2/3 = Rs.22,10,000/-

9.The compensation that has been fixed under the other heads are reasonable and does not require the interference of this Court.

10.In the light of the above discussion, the compensation awarded by the tribunal is modified as follows: Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.) Loss of Income/Dependency 22,10,000 Loss of Estate 15,000 Loss of Consortium 1,20,000 Funeral Expenses 15,000 Transportation Charges 10,000 Total 23,70,000

11.The compensation awarded by the tribunal at Rs.21,10,000/- is enhanced to Rs.23,70,000/-. The second respondent insurance company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation of Rs.23,70,000/-, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. Insofar as the enhanced compensation of Rs.2,60,000/- is concerned, the appellant/claimant will not be entitled for interest for the period of delay of 596 days as was ordered by this Court in C.M.P.No.7078 of 2026, dated 07.07.2026. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the claimants. The guidelines issued by the Division Bench of this Court in CMA No.2064 of 2026, dated 08.07.2026 shall be strictly complied with respect to disbursement of the compensation amount to the claimants. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.

12.In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed in the above terms. No Costs. 07-08-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ssr N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai).

07-08-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-08-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH 1. E.Kumari 2. E. Bhuvaneswari 3. R. Rasathi Appellant(s) Vs 1. S. Anierudh 2.Universal Sompo General Insurance Co.Ltd., Plot No.EL94, TTC Industrial Area, MIDC Mahape Navi, Mumbai 400 710. Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the Decree and Judgement dated 10.01.2024 made in MCOP.No.6628 of 2019, on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai). For Appellant(s): K.Varadhakamaraj For Respondent(s): Mrs.R.Sreevidhya for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.