VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl. S Baskaran Store v. Deputy State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 10643/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing.

3.With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.

¶4In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 06.10.2025, whereby, part of the demand recovered by show cause notice dated 27.06.2025 has been confirmed.

¶5Reading of the impugned order indicates that the demand in respect of Defect No.1 has been dropped after considering the reply. As far as Defect No.2 is concerned, the petitioner has not filed any reply. Therefore, the impugned order confirmed the demand recovered by show cause notice dated

27.06.2025 for the Financial Year 2018-2019.

¶6The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is willing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned order dated 06.10.2025 and therefore, the learned counsel seeks one opportunity for de novo adjudication.

¶7Under similar circumstances, orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

¶8Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits on Defect No.2, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Within such time, the petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 27.06.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 06.10.2025 as an addendum to the aforesaid show cause notice.

¶10Subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the respondent shall proceed to pass fresh order on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit.

¶11It is needless to state that, before passing any such order, th petitioner shall be heard.

¶12The attachment of the petitioner's bank account shall also stand automatically raised/vacated, subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations.

¶13It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned order.

¶14In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this writ petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶15This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

18.03.2026 sr Index:yes/no Website:yes/no To Deputy State Tax Officer, (Also Known as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) Kallakurichi Assessment Circle Kallakurichi

C.SARAVANAN, J. sr

18.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.11541 & 11544 of 2026 Tvl.S.Baskaran Store 91, Daily Market, Kallakurichi Villupuram-606202 ... Petitioner Vs. Deputy State Tax Officer, (Also Known as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) Kallakurichi Assessment Circle Kallakurichi ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the respondnet herein in FORM GST DRC-07 with Reference No.ZD331025028808H dated 06.10.2025 in GSTIN:33CABPB1316F1ZN/2018-19 dated 06.10.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner : MrN.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.