Kumar v. The State Rep.By,

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2) of BNS Act (Corresponding Section 379 IPC) and Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.11 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally quarried 2 units of red soil near Kozhipuliyur to Kottupakkam Road and transported the same in a lorry. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would fairly submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner, this Court, is inclined to grant Page3 of 5 anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; Page4 of 5

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MTL To

¶1The state rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Desur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.11 of 2026.

¶2The Judicial Magistrate Court Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o6417oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MTL CRLoOPoNo.o6417oofo2026 12-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Kumar S/o.Chinnakutti, No.90B, Mariyamman Kovil, Settupattu Village, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Desur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.11 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Cr.No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police station and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Sathiyaraj Elangovan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page2 of 5