S.Eswaran, v. The Thasildar

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.11.2025.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 05.11.2025 before the official respondents, requesting them to survey and mark the boundaries of the subject land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the official respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.11.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the official respondents are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the 2nd respondent. In such case, the 2nd respondent shall provide all necessary Page4 of 5 protection to the official respondents till the completion of survey at the subject land.

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The Thasildar Taluk office, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District

¶2The Inspector of Police Barur Police station, Krishnagiri District WPoNo.o20907oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o20907oofo2026 10-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Eswaran, S/o Subramani, Vadamangalam Village and Post, Panadhur Via, pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Thasildar Taluk office, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District 2. The Inspector of Police Barur Police station, Krishnagiri District 3. Moorthi S/o Subrmani residing at Vadamangalam village and post, Panadhu Via, pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the 1st Respondent with assistance of 2nd respondent to survey his lands measuring to an extent of 0.02.0 Acres comprised in S. Nos 90/5B, 0.04.0 in S. No 90/7B4,m 0.06.0 acres in S. no 90/9A, 0.10.0 acres in SNo. 90/9C, 0.10.5 acres in SN. No 90/9D1, 0.01.0 acres in S. no 90/9F2, 0.05.0 acres in S.No. 90/9G, 0.01.5 acres in S. no 90/9H, 0.09.0 acres in S No 90/9J, 0.03.5 acres in S. No 90/9K2, 0.08.5 acres and 0.03.0 in Page2 of 5 SNo. 90/9L in Patta No 534 situated at Vadamangalm Village, Pochampalli Taluk Krishnagiri District For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Thiruvengadam For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt's counsel, for R1 nd R2