- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2026
- Bench
- M.Dhandapani
- Case no.
- WP 10255/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani
Judgment
Page1 of 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WP NO. 10257 OF 2026 Jeeva W/o. (late)Desamuthu No.99/3, Nochikuppam, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
¶1The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
¶2The Principle Secretary Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
¶3The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005. ..Respondent(s) WP No. 10257 of 2026 A.Malathi W/o.Anandan, No.127, Ellaiyamman Kovil Street, Nochikuppam, Mylapore, Chennai-04. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
¶1The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Page2 of 8 Chennai-600 005.
¶2The Principle Secretary Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
¶3The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representations dated 08.01.2026 and to direct the 2nd respondents to allot a flat to the petitioner in the Nochikuppam housing scheme and pass. WP No. 10257 of 2026 Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representations dated 09.01.2026 and to direct the 2nd respondents to allot a flat to the petitioner in the Nochikuppam housing scheme and pass. For Petitioner(s) in both petitions: Mr.Edwin Frank for Mr.M.Madhuprakash For Respondent(s) in both petitions: Mr.Balaji, Standing Counsel for R1 to R3 Common Order Writ Petitions are filed by the petitioners to direct the respondents to allot a flat to them under the Nochikuppam Housing Scheme based on their Page3 of 8 representations dated 08.01.2026 and 09.01.2026 respectively.
¶2Case of the petitioners is that they are the residents of the Nochikuppam area for several decades and after the 2004 Tsunami, the Government of Tamil Nadu introduced housing redevelopment project aimed at providing pucca houses to the slum dwellers and coastal inhabitants. During the initial survey, the petitioners name were duly recorded as eligible occupants and thereby during the year 2015, the respondents issued a notification directing the residents to vacate their old structures for construction of new multi-storeyed apartments and now the said construction also got completed. However despite the petitioners eligibility for assignment, their name has been omitted from the allotment lists. Hence, they made several representations to the office of the 3rd respondent, however, no fruitful result has been yielded. Therefore, the petitioners once again made representations dated 08.01.2026 and 09.01.2026 respectively to the 1st respondent and even then no action has been taken on the said representations. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 08.01.2026 and 09.01.2026, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. Page4 of 8
¶4The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
¶6In view of the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the representations of the petitioners dated
08.01.2026 and 09.01.2026 respectively and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7With the above direction, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 17-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SK Page5 of 8 Page6 of 8 To
¶1The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
¶2The Principle Secretary Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005.
¶3The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005. WPoNo.o10255oofo2026 M.DHANDAPANIoJ. sk WPoNo.o10255oofo2026 AND WPoNO.o10257oOFo2026 17-03-2026 Page7oofo8 Page8 of 8
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.