VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

B.Ramesh v. The Superintendent of Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 7062/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This criminal original petition is filed to direct the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, to set aside the docket order dated 12.01.2026 and to take on file and number the petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.M.P.SR. No. 159 of 2016 and dispose of the same within a stipulated period of time.

¶2The petitioner filed a petition before the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, under Section 2\6 175(3) of BNSS/156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the Police to register an FIR against the proposed accused/respondents 5 to 7 herein, as the said respondents are alleged to have cheated the petitioner of his money. However, the said petition was returned by the learned Magistrate with the following endorsement: " On perusal of List of document 14 dated:

27.10.2025, the petitioner seeking recovery of money, it evident that the dispute is civil in nature. Hence, returned." Hence, the present criminal original petition.

¶3According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Magistrate ought to have directed investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. as the complaint prima facie discloses commission of cognizable offences. The petition has been returned solely on the premise that the petitioner is seeking recovery of money, but the proposed accused had dishonestly induced the petitioner to part with his money, followed by refusal to repay and intimidation and this conduct of the proposed accused clearly discloses criminal intent. Therefore, the learned counsel would submit that the learned Magistrate erred in returning the petition. 3\6

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents 1 to 4 and perused the materials on record.

¶5It is seen that the petitioner's complaint has not been considered and it has been returned without any adjudication. Whether the complaint of the petitioner has got prima facie material to register an FIR or it is civil in nature has to be decided only after hearing the petitioner.

¶6In view of the same, without going into the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner, the docket order dated 12.01.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.SR. No. 159 of 2016 is set aside. The learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, is directed to take up Crl.M.P. SR. No. 159 of 2016, hear the petitioner and thereafter, pass orders on merits independently.

¶7The criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.

23.03.2026 nv (Note to Office: Registry is directed to return the original to the petitioner.) 4\6 To

¶1The Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,

Ambur.

¶2The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirupathur District.

¶3The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vaniyampadi Sub Division, Tirupathur District.

¶4The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Town Police Station, Vaniyampadi, Tirupathur District.

¶5The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirupathur District.

¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 5\6 M. NIRMAL KUMAR,J. nv

23.03.2026 6\6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR B. Ramesh ..Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirupathur District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vaniyampadi Sub Division, Tirupathur District. 3. The Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Town Police Station, Vaniyampadi, Tirupathur District. 4. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirupathur District. 5. Chengalvarayan 6. Mohan 1\6 7. Bhaskar ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, to set aside the docket order dated 12.01.2026 and to take on file and number the petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS r/w Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner in Crl.M.P.SR. No. 159 of 2016 and dispose of the same within a stipulated period of time. For Petitioner :: Mr.R. Sunil Kumar For Respondents :: Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 to R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.