- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 March 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 6324/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan
Judgment
Order The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
13.01.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 7 r/w. 8, 9(i) r/w.10 of POCSO Act in Crime No.02 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that when the victim girl was traveling in an auto to reach the school, the auto driver, who is the petitioner herein had Page2 of 5 attempted to commit sexual assault on the minor victim girl. Hence, this case.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 13.01.2026. He also submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner.
¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and the statement given by the victim had been recorded under section 183 of BNSS. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner.
¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.
¶6From the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the totality of the statement given by the victim girl and upon the fact that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 13.01.2026, at this stage, investigation might have been completed and hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. Page3 of 5
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thiruvallur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; Page4 of 5 [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 18-03-2026 SHL Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thiruvallur
¶2The Puzhal Prison, Chennai
¶3The Inspector of Police W-14, AWPS Tiruvottiyur, Chennai.
¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras CRLoOPoNo.o6324oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o6324oofo2026 18-03-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Sanmugam ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police W-14, AWPS Tiruvottiyur, Chennai. Crime No.02 of 2026. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.02 of 2026 on the file of W-14, All Women Police Station Tiruvottiyur. For Petitioner: Mr.D.Chandrakumar For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.