VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramachandiran v. State Rep.By,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
7153/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 303(2) and 326(a) of the BNS Act, in Crime No.19 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail. Page1 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 9 of units of river sand without any valid permit. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that the petitioner is an Agriculturalist and only for his agriculture purpose some sand was transported and he has not at all a regular offender. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that no previous cases have been registered against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent. Page2 of 6

¶6From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) it is seen that the petitioner has no bad antecedents. Though, this Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, taking into consideration of the fact that he has no previous case, and upon the fond hope that he would mend himself in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvennainallur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; Page3 of 6

(c) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) (Non refundable) towards the account of CANCER INSTITUTE (WIA), Adayar, Savings Bank Account maintained at Union Bank of India, Madhya Kailash

Branch,

Cancer

Institute

(WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthi Campus, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai-36, bearing SB Account No.149710011005477, IFSC Code No.UBIN0814971, Branch Name and Code 814971, MICR No.600026110 and to produce the Bank Challan before the concerned Magistrate and the receipt shall be produced at the time of executing the bond;

(d) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm. for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required;

(e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 18-03-2026 dk Page4 of 6 To

¶1The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvennainallur.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Arakandanallur Police Station, Villupuram-605752.

¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. Page5 of 6 CRLoOPoNo.7153oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. dk CRLoOPoNo.o7153oofo2026 18-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ramachandiran S/o.Sekar, No.4/38, Old Colony, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Thirukovilur, Devanur, Villupuram - 605752. ...Petitioner Vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Arakandanallur Police Station, Villupuram - 605752. Cr.No.19/2026. ...Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge on bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Cr.no.19 of 2026 pending on the file of respondent. For Petitioner : M/s.B.K.Sri Krishna For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.