VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S. Priyanka v. The Chief Engineer,

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 April 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 14986/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to shift the High-Tension electric line passing over the petitioner's property comprised in T.S. No.712/9A, situated at Mayiladuthurai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that she is the absolute owner of the property situated in T.S. No.712/9A, Mayiladuthurai District, and intends to construct a residential house. However, a High-Tension electric line is passing directly over the said property, thereby preventing any construction. Though the petitioner submitted an online application on 22.05.2024 and paid the requisite charges, no effective action has been taken for shifting of High-Tension electric line. It is further stated that the 4th respondent issued a reply stating that objections have been raised by the neighbouring landowners.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the obligation to decide the alignment and shifting of the electric line lies with the statutory authorities and therefore, it would suffice, if a direction is issued by this Court to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025.

¶4Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submitted that based on the objections received from neighbouring landowners of the petitioner, the same was not processed. However, he submitted that the 4th respondent will consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 22.05.2024 and representation dated 19.11.2025 for shifting the High-Tension electric line, passes through petitioner's property, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to all necessary parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

21.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order vsi2

M. DHANDAPANI, J. vsi2 To

¶1The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶2The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai Electricity Distribution Circle, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶3The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District 609 001.

¶4The Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District.

¶5The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District.

21.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.04.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI S. Priyanka ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 2. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai Electricity Distribution Circle, Mayiladuthurai District. 3. The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District 609 001. 4. The Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District. 5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Administrative Branch, Mayiladuthurai District. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to shift the high- tension electric line passing over the petitioner's property comprised in T.S. No.712/9A, situated at Mayiladuthurai District, in accordance with the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.U. Kathiravan For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R. Prabhu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.