- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10541/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 19.12.2025, with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on
19.12.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents 1 and 2 till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Page4 of 7
¶3Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 16 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 to 16 is dispensed with.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 4 to 16, the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 16, the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page5 of 7
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 1 and 2, the 3rd respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.
(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To
¶1The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635109
¶2The Head Surveyor, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635109
¶3The Inspector of Police, Berigai Police Station, Berigai, Krishnagiri District-635105. Page6 of 7 WPoNo.o10541oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. GSA WPoNo.o10541oofo2026 24-03-2026 Page7oofo7
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Abbaiah, S/o.Venkataramanappa, No.4/446,Chinthaladhoddi Village, Berigai Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635109. 2. The Head Surveyor, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635109. 3. The Inspector of Police, Berigai Police Station, Berigai, Krishnagiri District-635105. 4. Chinnamuniyamma, W/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5. Abbaiya, S/o.(Late)Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page1 of 7 6. Chikka Abbaiya, S/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 7. Uthari Muniyappa, S/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 8. Lakshmaiya, S/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 9. Mallesh, S/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 10.Muniraj, S/o.(Late) Rajappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 11.Sriramappa, S/o.(Late) Venkataramanappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page2 of 7 12.N.Abbaiya, S/o.(Late).Narayanappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 13.N.Lakhmaiya, S/o.(Late).Narayanappa, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 14.Kenchamma, W/o.N.Abbaiya, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 15.A.Sandeep, S/o.N.Abbaiya, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 16.C.Pradeep, S/o.Chikka Abbaiya, Chinthaladhoddi village, Berigai Post, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to survey the petitioner's property and 3rd respondent to provide adequate police protection to avoid any hindrance caused by the respondents 4 to 16 at the time Page3 of 7 of surveying his property comprised in S.No.74/3C measuring to an extent of 0.15.00 hectares situated at Narikanapuram Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering the representation dated 26.12.2025 within a stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate (For R1 & R2) Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (For R3)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.