VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Ramasamy v. The Tashildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 10383/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on the online application, dated 31.01.2024, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

31.01.2024 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the respondents are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- Page2 of 4

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law.

(c) If police assistance is required, the 1st respondent is permitted to obtain the same by giving a representation to the police department and the police department shall act accordingly by granting police assistance.

(d) the respondents are directed to complete the aforesaid exercise within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(e) There shall be no order as to costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The Tashildhar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk and District.

¶2The Head Surveyor Taluk Survey and Settlement Department, Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. 24-03-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Ramasamy S/o. Subbu Gounder, West Kattukottai, Vinaitheerthaapuram Village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tashildhar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. 2. The Head Surveyor Taluk Survey and Settlement Department, Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to conduct a proper survey and demarcation of the petitioners property comprised in Survey No.88/8 measuring an extent of 91 Areas situated at Vinaitheerthaapuram Village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District and to fix and record the boundaries of the said property in accordance with law within such time as may be stipulated by this Court. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.SJ. Raja Janakiraman For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.