Raja @ Arulanantham v. Vanathammal

ORDER The petitioner has preferred the above revision challenging the judgment dated 03.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur, in Crl.A.No.25 of 2022, reversing the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ariyalur, acquitting the petitioner Page2 of 4 for the offence under Sections 417, 294 (b), 506 (ii) of I.P.C. The instant petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner.

¶2It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner and the defacto-complainant were relatives. It is alleged that the petitioner committed sexual assault against defacto complainant under the false pretext of marriage. Thus the petitioner has committed the aforesaid offences.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the on 09.02.2015, the petitioner / A1 went to the defacto-complainant's residence to invite her for his marriage and only thereafter, the present complaint has been lodged. He further submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there are substantial grounds raised in the above revision which require consideration, this Court is inclined to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: Page3 of 4

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ariyalur.

(ii) The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book and mobile numbers to ensure their identity; and

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the Trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the Trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the Trial Court.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 15-04-2026 ep Page4 of 4

C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ep To

¶1The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur

¶2The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ariyalur.

¶3The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ariyalur.

¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. IN CRL RC NO. 750 OF 2026 15-04-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN CRL RC NO. 750 OF 2026 Raja @ Arulanantham ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Vanathammal 2. State rep. by, The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ariyalur 3. Thilagavathi ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, pleased to suspend the sentence of conviction Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.25/2022 by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur, dated 03.03.2026 by reversing the acquittal Judgment passed in CC.No.113/2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ariyalur dated 18.07.2022 pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Elayaraja For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal side) for R2