VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

D.Jayaraman v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 10710/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 4th respondent, dated 23.02.2026, putting the petitioner on notice about the proposed survey and demarcation of boundaries made at the instance of the 5th respondent and pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.756 of 2026 dated 20.01.2026.

¶2Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse order is passed against the 5th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.

¶3The petitioner has raised objections through his representation dated 09.02.2026 with regard to the proposed survey to be conducted at Page No.2 of 6 the instance of the 5th respondent. The petitioner also claims that a civil suit is also pending between the parties, namely the petitioner and the 5th respondent and others.

¶4Necessarily, the objections raised by the petitioner will have to be considered by the 4th respondent before proceeding to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property on the basis of the request made by the 5th respondent and as per the directions of this Court on 20.01.2026 in W.P.No.756 of 2026 filed by the 5th respondent. In fact, the order dated

20.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.No.756 of 2026, the interest of the petitioner has been fully protected by directing the Tahsildar to issue notice to all the necessary parties before conducting survey and demarcation of boundaries.

¶5The apprehension of the petitioner is that despite the objections raised by him, the 4th respondent, without considering those objections, is proceeding with the survey and demarcation of boundaries. Necessarily, the objections of the petitioner has to be considered by the 4th respondent and only thereafter, the 4th respondent shall proceed with the survey and demarcation of the boundaries made at the instance of the 5th respondent. Page No.3 of 6

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to participate in the impugned proceedings by submitting his objections in writting with regard to the survey and demarcation of boundaries and the 4th respondent shall consider the said objections on merits and in accordance with law and only thereafter, the survey and demarcation of boundaries of the property as prayed for by the 5th respondent in his application can be done. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District.

4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

26.03.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.11631 of 2026 D.Jayaraman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. 5.S.Baskaran ... Respondents Page No.1 of 6 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order on 23.02.2026 in Na.Ka.No.308/2026/B2 and quash the same as null and void and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 to R4] Notice dispensed with [R5] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.