VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl J Sabari Contractor v. The Assistant Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 11645/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.TNC.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3Learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly concedes that the Petitioner will deposit 50% of the disputed tax. However, he would further submit that the amount that is said to have been recovered on 13.09.2025, may be adjusted.

¶4Learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that he has no objection to the same subject to verification.

¶5The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made the following endorsement to that effect in the Court.

¶6Recording the above submission, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order in view of the impugned order dated

27.04.2024 subject to Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax less any amount that is said to have been recovered or paid for towards the liability Page3 of 4 confirmed by the impugned order. The Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 03.06.2022 within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶8It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶9In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶10Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page4 of 4 C.SARAVANAN J. GV

¶11Any amount recovered or already paid by the Petitioner shall be adjusted towards the disputed tax.

¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GV To The Assistant commissioner Ponneri Assessment circle Integrated commercial Taxes building First floor, Room No.106, No.32 Elephant Gate Bridge Road Vepery, Chennai-600 003 AND WMP Nos. 12692 & 12690 of 2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP Nos. 12692 & 12690 of 2026 Tvl J SABARI CONTRACTOR Rep by its proprietor, Mr.Jayaraman Sabari) No.18, Vaigai Street, Surya Nagar, Minjur, Chennai, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, 601203. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant commissioner Ponneri Assessment circle Integrated commercial Taxes building First floor, Room No.106, No.32 Elephant Gate Bridge Road Vepery, Chennai-600 003 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in FORM GST DRC 07 with Reference No. ZD330424224206U dated 27.04.2024 along with the detailed order in GSTIN / 33AJYPS1170J1ZP / 2018-19 dated 27.04.2024 for the tax period April 2018 March 2019 and quash the same For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Kamala Kanth For Respondent(s): Mr.TNC.Kaushik, AGP Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.