VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Jegan v. The State of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 March 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 10935/2026

Judgment

ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the respondent to regularise the services of the petitioner forthwith as Mobile Unit Driver by applying the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.151, Social Welfare and Noon Meal Program Department, dated 16.10.2008.

¶2The petitioner is a physically challenged person with 40% locomotor disability, who being sponsored by the Employment Exchange, came to be appointed as Driver in the Mobile Unit of the respondent on 20.04.2015. He is now working in the Collectorate Campus, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. He has been initially paid a consolidated pay of Rs.8,000/- which has been enhanced annually. According to the petitioner, he had been favoured with all benefits by the respondents except for the benefit of regularisation. In this regard, he had submitted a representation on 05.06.2021 to bring him under the regular time scale of pay in terms of G.O.Ms.No.151, Social Welfare and Noon Meal Program Department dated 16.10.2008. In the said G.O., directives have been issued to the Head of the Departments to forward their proposals with respect to the employees who had discharged their duties for more than two years under the consolidated pay, so as to bring them under the regular time scale of pay. However, there was no response to the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2021. Page3 of 5

¶3Thereafter, on 11.11.2025, the petitioner had addressed a representation to the District Differently Abled Welfare Officer, Kanyakumari, who in turn had forwarded his proposal to the 2nd respondent to regularise the service of the petitioner and the same is pending without consideration. The petitioner would also submit that the 2nd respondent vide its proceedings dated

02.02.2026, had chosen to direct the District Welfare Officers to resort to filling up vacancies through outsourcing, which would defeat the legitimate expectation of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, a mandamus is issued to the respondents to consider petitioner's representation in the light of G.O.Ms.No.151, Social Welfare and Noon Meal Program Department, dated

16.10.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5

¶6With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 25-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DS To:

¶1The Secretary State of Tamil Nadu Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶2The Director Department of Welfare of Differently Abled Persons No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Lady Wellington Campus Chennai - 600 005. Page5 of 5

P.T.ASHA, J. DS 25-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA A.Jegan S/o.Late. Ayyappan Ambayanvilai Veedu Mathoorkonam, Arumanai Post Kanyakumari District - 629 151. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Director Department of Welfare of Differently Abled Persons No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Lady Wellington Campus Chennai - 600 005. ..Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith regularize the service of the petitioner as Mobile Unit Driver by applying the Guideline issued in G.O.Ms.No.151 Social Welfare and Noon Meal Program Department dated 16.10.2008 and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.