VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.B.Vinoth Kumar v. The Government Secretary

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 11308/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha

Judgment

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief :

"To direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the compassionate appointment in pursuance to the representation dated 14.07.2007, 13.07.2015 and 20.01.2026."

¶2The petitioner's father was working as a Sanitary Worker under the respondents and his service was regularized in the year 1991. While he was in service, he suffered from cancer and died on 14.06.2006, leaving behind his wife, Nirmala, an illiterate and two minor children, namely Sharmila and the petitioner. He was the sole breadwinner of the family. At the time of death of petitioner's father, he was only 14 years old. The petitioner's mother submitted Page2 of 6 an application dated 14.07.2007 to the second respondent seeking compassionate appointment. However, no action was taken on the same.

¶3After attaining majority, the petitioner had submitted a fresh application dated 23.07.2015 to the first respondent. Subsequently, on

07.12.2016, the petitioner has also produced the Integrated Community Certificate issued by the Tahsildar, Mylapore Taluk, as called for by the third respondent. The petitioner's family is suffering from severe financial hardship. Though the respondents repeatedly assured that the petitioner's request would be considered, no orders have been passed.

¶4Hence, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated

20.01.2026 to the respondents 2 and 3 seeking consideration of his claim for compassionate appointment. However, till date, no orders have been passed. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus.

¶5Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

Page3 of 6

¶6Considering the fact that the petitioner's representations are pending for a considerable period, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated

23.07.2015 and 20.01.2026, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, on or before 30.04.2026 and communicate the same to the petitioner.

¶7With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. List the matter for reporting compliance on 01.06.2026 . 26-03-2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order MRP Page4 of 6 To

¶1The Government Secretary Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-09.

¶2The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-03.

¶3The Assistant Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-03.

¶4The Zonal Officer Zone-IX, Lake Area, Nungambakkam, Chennai-034.

¶5Asst Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone-IX,Unit-25, Nungambakkam, Chennai-034. Page5 of 6

P.T.ASHA, J. MRP 26-03-2026 Page6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA K.B.Vinoth Kumar S/o.Late K.Babu, ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Government Secretary Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-09. 2. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-03. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-03. 4. The Zonal Officer Zone-IX, Lake Area, Nungambakkam, Chennai-034. 5. Asst Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone-IX,Unit-25, Nungambakkam, Chennai-034. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 6 This writ of mandamus filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the Respondents to appoint the petitioner on the compassionate appointment in pursuance to the representation dated 14.07.2007, 23.07.2015 and 20.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr. N.Beulah John Selvaraj For Respondent(s): Mr. T. Chandrasekaran, SGP, for R1 Mr. D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing counsel, for R2 to R5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.