- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 March 2026
- Bench
- M. Nirmal Kumar
- Case no.
- CRL OP 6867/2026
Judgment
O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents, not to harass the petitioner without following the due process of law.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was previously a tenant under Balaji and is now under C.R. Venkatesan, who had taken the commercial premises on rent. The erstwhile landlord, Balaji, had sold the property to C.R.Venkatesan. Thereafter, the petitioner had been paying rent to C.R.Venkatesan till November 2025. Subsequently, under the guise of a notice from the Corporation to demolish the building, the petitioner was forced out of the property. The 4th respondent is now forcing the petitioner to vacate and is causing harassment. Hence, this petition.
¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that the property originally belonged to Balaji, who later sold it to C.R. Venkatesan. The petitioner continued as a tenant. However, he defaulted in the payment of rent and has been squatting on the property without any authorisation. Further, the building is in a dilapidated condition and the Coimbatore Corporation has issued a demolition notice, as it poses a danger to the public. The petitioner was summoned on 15.03.2026, but he failed to appear and has instead approached this Court. Page3 of 4
¶4It is seen that in this case, the Corporation has already issued a demolition notice, considering that the building is in a dilapidated condition and poses a threat to public safety.
¶5In view of the above, this Court directs the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent on 23.03.2026 and produce all relevant documents. The 4th respondent shall conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action in the manner known to law.
¶6Recording the above, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 16-03-2026 AT To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police (South), Coimbatore South, Coimbatore.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police (West). Coimbatore West Zone, Coimbatore.
4.The Inspector of Police, B1, Big Bazaar Street Police Station, Town Hall, Coimbatore.
5.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o6867oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. AT CRLoOPoNo.o6867oofo2026 16-03-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR M.Murugesh ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (South), Coimbatore South, Coimbatore. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (West). Coimbatore West Zone, Coimbatore. 4. The State Rep., by, The Inspector of Police, B1, Big Bazaar Street Police Station, Town Hall, Coimbatore. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the respondent or his men or agents not to harass this petitioner without following the due process of law. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Vimal Bobby Crimson For Respondents: Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.