VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Srinivasan v. The Superintending Engineer

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 10917/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER WMP.No.11857 of 2026 has been filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition. This petition is ordered on payment of single court fee.

¶2By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3This writ petition has been filed for a direction, directing the 1st respondent to dispose petitioner appeal dated 21.11.2024 and petition under Ombudsman Act dated 15.03.2024 and reminder dated 11.02.2026 and consequently issue directions to the 1st respondent to dispose the same under the provisions of Ombudsman Act in accordance with law

¶4It is the case of the petitioner that the second petitioner is a tenant of the first petitioner and the respondents have demanded to pay excess amount. Fearing disconnection, the petitioner made payment of Rs.2,12,433/- by way of cheque. It is the grievance of the petitioner that petitioner has not consumed more EB and requested for return of the excess amount. Hence, the petitioner made a complaint on 15.03.2025 before the first respondent under Ombudsman Act and appeal dated 21.11.2024 are also pending without consideration till date. Hence, this writ petition .

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the first respondent to consider the appeal dated 21.11.2024 and the complaint under Ombudsman Act dated 15.03.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24-03-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes M.DHANDAPANI J. dhk To

1.The Superintending Engineer Salem EB Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Udayarpatti Bypass, Kamaraj Colony, Salem 14

2.The Executive Engineer (O and M) South Salem EB Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Udayarpatti Bypass, Kamaraj Colony, Salem 14

3.The Assistant Engineer ( O and M) TANGEDCO, Panaimarathupatti, Salem 636 204

24-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 10917 of 2026 and WMP.No.11857 of 2026 1. S.Srinivasan 2. Rajesh Kumar Jain Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintending Engineer Salem EB Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Udayarpatti Bypass, Kamaraj Colony, Salem 14 2.The Executive Engineer (O and M) South Salem EB Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Udayarpatti Bypass, Kamaraj Colony, Salem 14 3.The Assistant Engineer ( O and M) TANGEDCO, Panaimarathupatti, Salem 636 204 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the 1st respondent to dispose petitioner appeal dated 21.11.2024 and petition under Ombudsman Act dated 15.03.2024 and reminder dated 11.02.2026 and consequently issue directions to the 1st respondent to dispose the same under the provisions of Ombudsman Act in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s): Ms.D.Bharathy For Respondent: Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.