VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Veerendra Patel v. The Thaisldar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 11235/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 22.02.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 22.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 14, notice to the respondents 4 to 14 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶5No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 1 and 2 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 to 14 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 14 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 1 and 2, the third respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 02-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Thaisldar Taluk office Anchetty Taluk Krishnagiri

2.The Head surveyor Taluk office Anchetty Taluk Krishnagiri

3.The Inspector of Police, Anchetty Police Station, Anchetty taluk Krishnagiri District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

02-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Veerendra Patel S/O.Chandrappa Door No.1/38, Anniyalam village and Post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Thaisldar Taluk office Anchetty Taluk Krishnagiri 2.The Head surveyor Taluk office Anchetty Taluk Krishnagiri 3.The Inspector of Police, Anchetty Police Station, Anchetty taluk Krishnagiri District 4.Krishnan S/o.Late.Periyakuttappan Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri District 5.Puttammal D/o.Late.Periyakuttappan Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 6.Muniyamma D/o.Late.Periyakuttappan S/o.Late.Periyakuttappan Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri District 7.Muniyamma W/o.Kaviyappan Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 8.Murugesan S/o.Late.Muniyappan Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 9.Ramakka W/o.Late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 10.Chinnakanni S/o.Late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 11.Madhappa S/o.Late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 12.Krishnan S/o.Late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 13.Chinnathambi S/o.late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri 14.Kiliyamma D/o.late.Kaliveeran Maavanatti village Anchetty post Denkanikottai Taluk Krishnagiri Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey the petitioners property and 3rd respondent to provide adequate police protection to avoid any hindrance cause the respondents 4 to 14 at the time of surveying the property comprised in S.No.309/4B measuring to an extent of 75 cents situated at Anchetty west village, Anchetty Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering the representation dated 22.2.2026 within a stipulated period For Petitioner(s): M.Mohamed Riyaz G.NARESH KUMAR M.FAZIL PERAPRIVALAN C.BALAJI PRASANNA For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt.Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.V.Meganathan Govt.Advocate For R3 R4 to R14 - Notice dispensed with

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.