P.Raja v. The District Collector

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to cancel the patta in respect of Survey Nos.686/6, 687/1 and 688/5 standing in the name of respondents 5 to 9 for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner claims that illegally private respondents namely 5 to 9 have obtained patta in their names for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks for cancellation of the same. The petitioner had given a representation on 19.06.2025 to the official respondents seeking for cancellation of patta. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse order is being passed against respondents 5 to 9, notice to respondents 5 to 9 is dispensed with by this Court. Page3 of 4

4.No prejudice would be caused to the official respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of respondents 5 to 9 and any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta in respect of Survey Nos.686/6, 687/1 and 688/5 standing in the name of respondents 5 to 9 for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of respondents 5 to 9 and also any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To

¶1The District Collector Salem District, Salem -636 001

¶2The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, Salem -636 001

¶3Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur Division, Salem District -636102

¶4The Tahsildhar, Attur Taluk, Salem District -636102 02-04-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE P.Raja ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Salem District, Salem -636 001 2. The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, Salem -636 001 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur Division, Salem District -636102 4. The Tahsildhar, Attur Taluk, Salem District -636102 5. P. Poongodi 6. P. Devaraj 7. R. Senbagarasan 8. K. Gopi 9. Baskar ..Respondent(s) Directing the 3rd Respondent to follow the Patta cancellation procedure in respect of the petitioner agriculture land in Survey Nos.686/6, 687/1 and 688/5 situated at Ramanaickkenpalaiyam North Village Attur Taluk, Page2 of 4 Salem District, ad pass order based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2025 and such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Velu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R4 ND / W - R5 to R9