VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Prathiveenan v. State Rep.By,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 6986/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2) and 326 (a) of BNS Act, 2023 (379, 430 of I.P.C) and 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act in Crime No.78 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 1 unit Norambu sand without any valid permit. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that no previous cases have been registered against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.

¶6From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) it is seen that the petitioner has no bad antecedents. Though, this Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, taking into consideration of the fact that he has no previous Page3 of 6 case, and upon the fond hope that he would mend himself in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirupthur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fail to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) (Non refundable) towards the account of CANCER INSTITUTE (WIA), Adayar, Savings Page4 of 6 Bank Account maintained at Union Bank of India, Madhya Kailash

Branch,

Cancer

Institute(WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthi Campus, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai-36, bearing SB Account No.149710011005477, IFSC Code No.UBIN0814971, Branch Name and Code 814971, MICR No.600026110 and to produce the Bank Challan before the concerned Magistrate and the receipt shall be produced at the time of executing the bond;

(d) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm. for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required;

(e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 18-03-2026 ep Page5 of 6 To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirupathur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Natrampalli Police Station, Natrampalli, Tirupathur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o6986oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. ep CRLoOPoNo.o6986oofo2026 18-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Prathiveenan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Natrampalli Police Station, Natrampalli, Tirupathur District. Cr.No.78 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 78 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Natrampalli Police Station, Natrampalli, Tirupathur District For Petitioner(s): Mr.Vinodhkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Criminal side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.