- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10484/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to register and release the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration without insisting for production of No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the fourth respondent.
¶2When the matter came up for hearing on 16.03.2026, Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepted notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3; and notice was also ordered to the fourth respondent returnable by this date.
¶3Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has placed on record a letter dated 13.03.2026 issued by the fourth respondent to the Registration Department stating no objection for registration of the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration on the ground that the property in question is not the subject matter of any land acquisition. A copy of the said letter dated 13.03.2026 has also been handed over to the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. Page3 of 4
¶4Since the fourth respondent has stated no objection as seen from the letter dated 13.03.2026, there should not be any impediment for the third respondent to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to verify genuineness of the aforesaid letter dated 13.03.2026 issued by the fourth respondent; and on verification, if it is found to be genuine, the third respondent shall register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration if it is otherwise in order; and thereafter, release the same to the petitioner subject to the payment of requisite stamp duty and registration fee. The third respondent is directed to complete the aforesaid exercise within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. 23-03-2026 RKM To
¶1The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028
¶2The District Registrar No.102, State Bank Road, District Collector Office Campus, Coimbatore -641 018
¶3The Sub-Registrar No.171, Railway Feeder Road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore -641 301
¶4The Special Tahsildhar Land Acquisition Grade-I, Highways Schemes Coimbatore - WPoNo.o10484oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKM WPoNo.o10484oofo2026 23-03-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Thangarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028. 2. The District Registrar No.102, State Bank Road, District Collector Office Campus, Coimbatore -641 018 3. The Sub-Registrar No.171, Railway Feeder Road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore -641 301 4. The Special Tahsildhar Land Acquisition Grade-I, Highways Schemes Coimbatore - ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 3rd Respondent to register and release the pending Doc.No.P/Periyanayakkanpalayam/123/2026 bearing Receipt No.4692/2026 dated 19.02.2026 forthwith without insisting on NOC from the 4th Respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Rajagopalan, SC for Mr.D.G.Hariprasath For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, SGP (R1 to R3) Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.