- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 6852/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
23.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 4(1)(B), 4(1)(C), 4(1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition(Amendment) Act, 2024 in Crime No.43 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 190 bottles of liquor of various brands during patrol and a case was registered. Page2 of 5
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated. The petitioner is in custody from 23.02.2026, he has no previous case and he is willing to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2026 and there is no previous case against him. However, the allegation involves possession of 190 bottles. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.
¶6From the submission of the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that though the allegation involves a larger quantity, considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous case and has been in incarceration since
23.02.2026, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.
¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand Page3 of 5 only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vazhapadi, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. for a period of 60 days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 17-03-2026 NSL Page4 of 5 Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vazhapadi.
¶2Central Prison, Salem.
¶3The Inspector of Police, Karipatty Police Station, Salem District.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o6852oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o6852oofo2026 17-03-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ganesan ..Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police Karipatty Police Station, Salem District. (Cr.No.43/2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.43 of 2025 on the file of the Kariyapatty Police Station, Salem. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Ganesan For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.