VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Darshita v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 12247/2026

Judgment

Order The writ petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to consider petitioner representation dated 24.02.2026 and return all petitioner original educational certificates without insisting upon payment of the entire course fee.

¶2Case of the petitioner is that she was allotted a BDS (Management Quota) seat in Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Uthandi, Chennai. The petitioner joined the course, but she was unable to continue the course and therefore, discontinued the same at the earliest possible stage. The petitioner also informed 4th respondent about the discontinuation vide letter dated

22.01.2026, however, the 4th respondent refused to receive the said letter and informed that the same would be accepted only if it was accompanied by a Demand Draft towards the fees payable for the entire course period and retained the original educational certificates, submitted at the time of admission, which prevents the petitioner from pursuing further education. Hence, the petitioner made representation dated 24.02.2026, to the respondents requesting to return the same. Since the said representation was not considered till date, the petitioner is before this Court. Page3 of 5

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 24.02.2026 on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶6In view of the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

24.02.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SK Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Director, Directorate of Medical education, Kilpauk, Chennai.

¶2The Registrar Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai 32

¶3The Chairperson, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, No. 2/102 East coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai 119 WPoNo.o12247oofo2026 M.DHANDAPANIoJ. sk WPoNo.o12247oofo2026 AND WMPoNO.o13372oOFo2026 27-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WMP NO. 13372 OF 2026 K.Darshita DF4, Color Field Apartment, Sekaran Nagar, Perumbakkam, Chennai 100 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Director, Directorate of Medical education, Kilpauk, Chennai 2. The Registrar Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai 32 3. The Chairperson, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, No. 2/102 East coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai 4. the Principal Ragas Dental College and Hospital, No. 2/102 East coast Road, Uthandi, Chennai ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 to consider petitioner representation dated 24.02.2026 and consequently return all petitioner original educational certificates without insisting upon payment of the entire course fee and pass Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Haribabu For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Tippu sultann, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.M.Sivavarthanan for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.