VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chakravarthy v. The Commissioner of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 12263/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 24.03.2025, with the assistance of the 2nd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

24.03.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1 & 3 and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Since no Page2 of 5 adverse orders are passed against the 4th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 3rd respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the 4th respondent, the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 3rd respondent is directed to issue notice to the 4th respondent, the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 3rd respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent shall render Page3 of 5 police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.

(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To

¶1The Commissioner of Police Tambaram, Commissionerate office, Tambaram.

¶2The Inspector of Police Gudvanchery Police station, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalapttu District.

¶3The Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalapttu District. Page4 of 5 WPoNo.o12263oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. GSA WPoNo.o12263oofo2026 07-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Chakravarthy ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Tambaram, Commissionerate office, Tambaram 2. The Inspector of Police Gudvanchery Police station, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalapttu District 3. The Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalapttu District 4. B.Venkatesan ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent 3 to measure the petitioner's land comprised in S.No 264/ 5A1 measuring to an extent of 40.5 cents bearing patta No.8995 situated at Karanai Puducherry village, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpattu District, put boundary stone and enjoyment of the petitioner's possession by considering the representation dated 24.03.2025 and Page1 of 5 directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to take adequate precautionary measures and to provide necessary Police protection to measure the Petitioners land. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Shree Raam, for Mr.M. Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader (For R1 & R3) Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (For R2)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.