VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Sirajunnisa v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 11369/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the official respondents to issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's last representation dated 08.08.2025.

¶2The petitioner claims that she traces the title over the property from the year 1931. According to the petitioner, the predecessor in title had exchanged the subject property, which earlier belonging to the temple and by the exchange of land with the temple, the predecessor in title became the owner of the larger extent of land. Thereafter, through subsequent conveyances, the petitioner has now become the owner of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Page3 of 6 writ petition. The petitioner seeks issuance of separate patta in her name for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner had given several representations and the last such representation was given on

08.08.2025 to the official respondents seeking transfer of patta in her name. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of respondents 5 and 6.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of respondents 5 and 6 and any other third party whom the 4th respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. Page4 of 6

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 4th respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2025 seeking issuance of separate patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of respondents 5 and 6 and any other third party whom the 4th respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

07.04.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sp Page5 of 6 To

¶1The District Collector, District Collectorate, Cuddalore District.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, The Office of the District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Cuddalore District.

¶3The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

¶4The Tahsildar office of the Tahsildar Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

¶5Arulmigu Shri Thillaimannan Temple, Rep. by its Trustee, Shri Thillaiamman Temple, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.

¶6The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. WPoNo.o11369oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. sp WPoNo.o11369oofo2026

07.04.2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A.Sirajunnisa ...Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Cuddalore District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, The Office of the District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Cuddalore District. 3. The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 4. The Tahsildar office of the Tahsildar Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 5. Arulmigu Shri Thillaimannan Temple, Rep. by its Trustee, Shri Thillaiamman Temple, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 6. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. ..Respondents Page2 of 6 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to issue patta in respect of the property bearing Door No.67, Plot No.27/G2, Labbai Street, Chidambaram Municipal Limit, comprised in TS No.249/1, measuring an extent of 2100 sq ft in favour of the petitioner as sought vide representation lastly dated 08.08.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.I.Kowser Nissar For Respondents: Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate [R1 to R4] Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader [R5 & R6] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.