- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 13221/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration charges of Rs.1,07,800/- based on the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2026.
¶2According to the petitioner, she is not liable to pay the stamp duty for the rectification deed, registered as document No.5855 of 2025 on the file of the third respondent. According to the petitioner, in order to get the rectification deed released, the petitioner had to pay the excess stamp duty of Rs.1,07,800/-. According to the petitioner, the rectification deed was executed only to rectify the typographical mistakes committed in the earlier settlement deed, and therefore, there was no necessity for the petitioner to pay the stamp duty of a sum of Rs.1,07,800/- for the execution and registration of the rectification deed.
¶3The petitioner had given a representation on 26.02.2026 to the respondents, requesting them to refund the sum of Rs. 1,07,800/-, which according to the petitioner was paid in excess towards the stamp duty and the registration charges for the execution and registration of the rectification deed bearing No. 5855 of 2025. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.
¶4Mr. U. Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
¶5No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
¶7For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2026, seeking for refund of the alleged excess stamp duty and registration charges amounting to Rs.1,07,800/- said to have been paid by the petitioner inadvertently for the registration of the rectification deed bearing No.5855 of 2025 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner.
¶8Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 15-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To
1.The State of Tamil nadu Represented by its, Secretary to Government, Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St. Geroge, Chennai 600 009
2.The District Registrar District Registrar office, 5th Floor, Singapore Plaza, Crosscut Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore 641 012
3.The Sub Registrar Sub-Registrar office, Anamalai, Polcie station Road, Anamalai Taluk, Coimbatore District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab
15-04-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Kamalam W/o Late Venue Gopalakrishna Swami, D/o Veluswamy Gounder, Door No 182 Main Road, Vadaikulam, Anamalai Taluk, Coimbatore District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil nadu Represented by its, Secretary to Government, Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St. Geroge, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Registrar District Registrar office, 5th Floor, Singapore Plaza, Crosscut Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore 641 012 3.The Sub Registrar Sub-Registrar office, Anamalai, Polcie station Road, Anamalai Taluk, Coimbatore District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the Respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 26.02.2026 seeking refund of the excess stamp duty and registration charges of Rs 1,07,800/- collected at the time of registration of the Rectification Deed bearing Docuemnt No 5855/ 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.V. Arunachalagiri For Mr.K.Vingeshwaran For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan,SGP For Respondent
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.