- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 11742/2026
Judgment
Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her representation dated 06.10.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner had submitted her representation dated 06.10.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent. Since no adverse order is being passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with. Page3 of 6
4.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
5.No prejudice will be caused to the third respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the fifth respondent as well as any other party whom the third respondent deems it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the third respondent is directed to issue notice to the fifth respondent and also to any other party, whom the third respondent deems it fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the third respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the third respondent, the fourth respondent shall Page4 of 6 render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA Page5 of 6 To
¶1The District Collector O/o. the District collector, Kallakurichi district, Kallakurichi
¶2the revenue Divisional officer Kallakurichi , Kallakurichi district
¶3The Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk office, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi district
¶4The inspector of police Chinnasalem police station, Kallakurichi district WPoNo.o11742oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. VGA WPoNo.o11742oofo2026 07-04-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Padma ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector O/o. the District collector, Kallakurichi district, Kallakurichi 2. The revenue Divisional officer Kallakurichi , Kallakurichi district 3. The Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk office, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi district 4. The inspector of police Chinnasalem police station, Kallakurichi district 5. Thiru. Raja ..Respondent(s) directing the 3rd respondent to survey the properties which is properties situated in Survey No. 88/2 to the total extent of 0.51 cents at Kallanatham village , Chinnasalem taluk, Kallakurichi district based on the representation of the petitioner dated 6.10.2025 with aid of the 4th respondent police within stipulated time may be fixed by this Honble court. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Senthilkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, GA for R1 to 3 Mr.V.Meganathan, GA (Crl.side) for R4 Notice dispensed with for R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.