VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Prabhavathi v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 11196/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 14.01.2026 by which the patta standing in the name of the petitioner, was Page3 of 5 cancelled and was transferred patta in the name of one Kaniyan, father of Arumugam, the father of respondents 6 and 7.

¶2Aggrieved by the said impugned order dated 14.01.2026, the petitioner has filed a revision petition before the 2nd respondent on 09.02.2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the revisional authority, viz., the 2nd respondent, to dispose of the said revision petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5. Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents 6 and 7 in this writ petition, notice to them is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the revision petition dated

09.02.2026, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of respondents 6 and 7, by adhering to the principles of natural justice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Page4 of 5

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's revision petition dated 09.02.2026.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, by considering the petitioner's revision petition dated 09.02.2026 along with supporting documents, after hearing the objections of all the necessary parties, which includes the respondents 6 and 7, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by adhering to the principles of natural justice.

¶7With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 5

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKA

¶1The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, Chengalpattu District.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, madurantagam, Chengalpattu District.

¶4The Tahsildar, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District.

¶5The Sub Registrar, Cheyyr, Chengalpattu District. 26-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and WMP No.12192 of 2026 S.Prabhavathi W/o.Sambanthamoorthy, No.56, karumbakkam village, Cheyyur taluk, Chengalpattu District. Pin - 603 304. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurantagam, Chengalpattu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District. 5. The Sub Registrar, Cheyyr, Chengalpattu District. Page2 of 5 6. Mr.Periyaswamy, S/o.Arumugam, school street, karumbakkam village, kottaikadu post, Chengalpattu - 603 304. 7. MR.Ranganathan S/o.Arumugam, School Street, Karumbakkam Village, Kottaikadu Post, Chengalpattu - 603 304. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in Pro.Na.Ka.3534/2023/A dated 14.01.2026 to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the 3rd respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry into the matter and pass a speaking orders by summoning the parties involved in the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Muthukumaran For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For R1 to R5 R6 & R7 -Pvt

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.