- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 12271/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to rectify the FMB Sketch in respect of the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition and thereafter, issue patta in favour of the petitioner for Survey No.155/4 based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.As seen from the documents filed along with this Writ Petition, the petitioner's representation referred to supra has already been acted upon by the 3rd respondent and he has also conducted an enquiry. Since the 3rd respondent has already acted upon the representation of the petitioner dated 17.09.2025 and he has already commenced enquiry, this Court is of the considered view that no Page2 of 4 prejudice would be caused to the 3rd respondent if a direction is issued to the 3rd respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation within a short time, after hearing all the necessary parties. Since no adverse orders are passed as against the respondents 6 & 7, notice to the respondents 6 & 7 in this Writ Petition is dispensed with by this Court.
3.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2025, seeking for rectification of the FMB Sketch for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition and thereafter, issue patta in favour of the petitioner for Survey No.155/2004, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of all the necessary parties, which includes the respondents 6 and 7, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To
¶1The District Collector Salem District Collector office, Salem District.
¶2The District Revenue officer Salem District Collector office, Salem District.
¶3The Revenue divisional officer Attur Sub Division, Salem District.
¶4The Superintendent of police Salem District, Salem.
¶5The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk office, Salem District-636 112. and W.M.P.No.13403 of 2026 07-04-2026 Page4 of 4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.13403 of 2026 M.Subramani ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Salem District Collector office, Salem District. 2. The District Revenue officer Salem District Collector office, Salem District. 3. The Revenue divisional officer Attur Sub Division, Salem District. 4. The Superintendent of police Salem District, Salem. 5. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk office, Salem District-636 112. 6. Ramasamy 7. Ramalingam ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4 PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 17.09.2025 by rectifying the FMB Sketch for the S.Nos.155/3 and 155/4 at Aragalur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District and issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the S.No.155/4. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Velu For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate (For R1 to 3 & 5) Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (For R4)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.