- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 11058/2026
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the boundaries and issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to the Writ Petition, based on the petitioner's application dated
18.10.2023. Page2 of 5
2.Since the application submitted by the petitioner with the respondents 2 and 3 seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries is old one, the petitioner has to submit a fresh application.
3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order has been passed against the respondents 3 to 5 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is dispensed with in this writ petition.
4.Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is willing to submit a fresh application. The said undertaking is recorded.
5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh online application with the 2nd respondent, seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries and for issuance of separate patta in the name of the petitioner for the subject property, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said online application, the 3rd respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate all the boundaries of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Page3 of 5 Petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 and 5, neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3rd respondent deem fit to put on notice. Once the survey and demarcation of boundaries is completed, the 3rd respondent shall, if the petitioner is found eligible for the grant of separate patta, consider the petitioner's application seeking for issuance of separate patta, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner. The 3rd respondent shall complete the aforesaid exercise within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To
¶1The District Collector Office of Collectorate Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri.
¶2The Tahsildar Shoolagiri Taluk Shoolagiri
¶3The Taluk Surveyor Shoolagiri Taluk Shoolagiri Page4 of 5
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA 24-03-2026 Page5 of 5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sarasu Chitra W/o.Sakathivel Puthur, Mariyamman Kovil Street Dharmapuri Taluk Dharmapuri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office of Collectorate Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri. 2. The Tahsildar Shoolagiri Taluk Shoolagiri 3. The Taluk Surveyor Shoolagiri Taluk Shoolagiri 4. Palamma W/o.Ramasamy Krishnana Thottikarapalli Gudiapalli, Chithur Taluk Andhra Pradesh 517425. Page1 of 5 5. Balamma W/o.Thimmarayan Ponnagar Village Thottikarapalli Post ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to survey and demarcate the boundaries and issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner in Survey No. 62/2 to an extent of 0.35 cents in Mallasandaram Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri, based on the petitioner's application dated 18.10.2023. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate (For R1 to R3)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.