Tvl N A Exotic Resource Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner St

ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned recovery proceedings issued under Section 79 (c)(i) of the TNGST Act to recover the tax Page2 of 4 due from the petitioner's buyers mentioned in the impugned notice as detailed below.

¶2There is no doubt that the amount is due and payable by the petitioner in terms of Section 75 (12) read with Section 79 of the respective GST Enactment. The petitioner also has no statutory rights to claim payment in instalments in terms of Section 80 of the GST enactment. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however submits that the petitioner has been suffering severe Page3 of 4 financial stress and there has been a delay in discharging the tax liability.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will endeavour to discharge the tax liability in three equated monthly instalments and that the first instalment will be paid by 20th April 2026 along with tax due for the month of March 2026 and thereafter, the succeeding month along with each month's due.

¶4The learned counsel for the respondent however submits that any claim for instalments would be contrary to the mandate of Section 80 of the respective GST enactment and the petitioner is responsible for the predicament which the petitioner faces on account of the impugned notice issued under Section 79(c) of the respective GST enactment.

¶5Recording the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner and partly overruling the objection of the learned counsel for the respondent, I am inclined to direct the respondents to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance subject to petitioner depositing 1/3rd of the amount in three equated monthly instalments payable by 20th of each month, together with tax due for previous month. It is made clear that in case there is any default made by the petitioner, respondent is at liberty to issue a fresh notice in lieu of the such modification on the balance amount due on the date of default. Page4 of 4

C.SARAVANAN, J. JAI

¶6The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above ratio. It is made clear that the petitioner shall cooperate with the respondent in discharging the tax liability. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall also pay the interest on the delayed payment. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI To

¶1Deputy Commissioner ST No 26, Abhirami C complex, kancheepuram High Raod, Chengalpattu 603 101.

¶2State Tax officer commercial Tax officer, Maraimalai Nagar assessment Circle, Chenglapattu. 01-04-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.13241& 13242 of 2026 Tvl N A Exotic Resource Private Limited Rep by its Director, 9/10 Flat, Thayumanavar Street, Maraimalai Nagar Kancheepuram 603 209. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy Commissioner ST No 26, Abhirami C complex, kancheepuram High Raod, Chengalpattu 603 101 2. State Tax officer commercial Tax officer, Maraimalai Nagar assessment Circle, Chenglapattu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notice in GSTIN 33AAECN5062E2ZR/Apr 2024 to Mar 2026, dated10.03.2026 issued by the 1st Respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Ramesh For Respondent(s): Ms. Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Govt Advocate