VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl Sk Enterprises v. The State Tax Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 12787/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, the learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Order dated

21.10.2024, whereby, the proposal in Show Cause Notice in DRC 01 dated

19.06.2024 has been confirmed for the tax period 2020-21 in the absence of reply to the Show Cause Notice.

¶4The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the entire amount has been recovered on 25.08.2025. Page2 of 6

¶5The learned counsel for the Respondent is on instructions to report that the amount has been indeed recovered, however, submits that the petitioner has not paid the interest and penalty imposed in the impugned Order.

¶6Considering that the impugned Order is an exparte order, I am inclined to remit the case back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax within a period of thirty

(30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending such exercise, all recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

¶7Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 19.06.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

21.10.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 19.06.2024.

¶8In case there has been any recovery or any other amount paid by the Petitioner towards the tax liability confirmed vide impugned order dated

21.10.2024, the same shall be set off against the amount already deposited as ordered above. This shall however be subject to verification by the Respondent. Page3 of 6

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits in accordance with law within a period of three months of such reply/ predeposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated. All the issues are left open to be canvassed by the Petitioner.

¶10In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the concerned Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶11Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 2nd Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page4 of 6

¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 08-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Vv To The State Tax Officer, Choolai Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPAJM Annexure Building, Greams Road, 1st Floor, Chennai-600 006 Page5 of 6

C.SARAVANAN, J. VV WP No.12787 of 2026 08-04-2026 Page6 of 6 Page7 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No.12787 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.13988 and 13989 of 2026 Tvl SK Enterprises Rep by its Proprietor Mr P Senthil Kumar No.4/87, T.K. Mudali Street, Choolai, Chennai-600 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer, Choolai Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPAJM Annexure Building, Greams Road, 1st Floor, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records of the Respondent in Order dated 21.10.2024 in GSTIN 33BMGPS0148L1ZW/ 2020- 21 bearing Reference No. ZD331024138495L and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principle of natural justice and further direct the Respondent to withdraw all its proceedings in FORM GST DRC-13 initiated against the Petitioner. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Ms.Darshitha R For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.