- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 11572/2026
Judgment
Order This writ petition has been filed to direct respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2024 seeking for issuance of patta in his name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.According to the petitioner, the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition has been assigned in his favour by the Government. According to the petitioner, till date, he has not been issued patta despite making representation on 20.02.2024 to respondents 2 and 3.
3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
4.The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this writ petition in support of his representation seeking for grant of patta. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the same.
5.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued to the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation seeking for grant of patta for the property, Page3 of 4 morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
6.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
7.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2024 seeking for grant of patta in his name for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the necessary parties, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To
¶1The District Collector GST road, Venbakkam, Chengalpattu district
¶2The district Revenue officer Tambaram Taluk office, 2nd floor, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district
¶3The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Taluk office, 2nd floor, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district
¶4The Tahsildar Tambaram Taluk office, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district 07-04-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Kalainesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector GST road, Venbakkam, Chengalpattu district. 2. The district Revenue officer Tambaram Taluk office, 2nd floor, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district 3. The Revenue Divisional officer Tambaram Taluk office, 2nd floor, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district 4. The Tahsildar Tambaram Taluk office, Tambaram, Chengalpattu district ..Respondent(s) directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.02.2024 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue suitable direction to the 3rd and 4th respondent to grant patta. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.