VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Arukkani v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 11548/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition based on the petitioner's representations dated 29.12.2021 and 13.03.2024mwithin a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2According to the petitioner, she is the mother of the 3rd respondent. She had earlier executed a Settlement deed in favour of the 3rd respondent for the subject property. Subsequently, she cancelled the same. By virtue of the cancellation deed, the petitioner seeks for restoration of patta in her name. The petitioner had given representations on 20.12.2021 and 13.03.2024 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same have not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on Page3 of 5 behalf of respondents 1 and 2. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representations, as stated above, are directed to be disposed of by the respondents, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent and all other necessary parties, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5Since the Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramathi Vellore, Namakkal District, is the competent authority to adjudicate the petitioner's representations, this Court by exercising its suo-motu powers, impleads the Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramathi Vellore, Namakkal District as the 4th respondent in this writ petition. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause-title. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, also undertakes to accepts notice on behalf of the newly impleaded 4th respondent.

¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representations dated 29.12.2021 and 13.03.2024. Page4 of 5

¶7For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the newly impleaded 4th respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representations dated 29.12.2021 and 13.03.2024 seeking for transfer of patta for the subject property more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent and all other necessary parties, whom the 4th respondent deems fit to enquire within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. No costs. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 5

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKA To

¶1The District collector Namakkal District.

¶2The Tahsildar Paramathi Vellore Taluk Namakkal District.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramathi Vellore, Namakkal District, 02-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arukkani W/o.Late Ponnusamy No.15/73 East Street Kolakkatupudhur, Paramathi Vellore Tk Namakkal District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Namakkal District. 2. The Tahsildar Paramathi Vellore Taluk Namakkal District. 3. Kanniyan S/o.Late P.Ponnusamy No.15/73 East Street Kolakkatupudhur Paramathi Vellore Taluk Namakkal District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramathi Vellore, Namakkal District [R4 is suo-motu impleaded in this writ Petition as 4th respondent by AQJ vide order dated 02.04.2026] ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 29.12.2021 and 13.03.2024 and transfer the patta in the name of the Page2 of 5 petitioner in the survey nos. 124/7A2, 124/3C2, 124/2B3, 124/2B4, 124/6B, 124/2B1 and Survey No.131/1A and pass. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.T.S.Sivakumar S.Lakshmipathy S.Jayamaran For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugan Government Advocate for R1 to R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.