VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Arulmigu Siva Subramania Swami v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 January 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 20902/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for survey and demarcation of the boundaries for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

2.The petitioner has failed to file online application to enable the respondents to consider petitioner's request to survey and demarcate the boundaries for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction would submit that the petitioner is willing to submit an online application with the 3rd respondent seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the 3rd respondent, if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh online application seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries and if a direction is issued to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's online application, on merits and in accordance with law and thereafter, if possible survey and demarcate the boundaries as requested by the petitioner, after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's request for survey and demarcation of the boundaries for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh online application for survey and demarcation of boundaries for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said online application within the stipulated time, the 3rd respondent shall consider the said application on merits and in accordance with law and if legally possible, survey and demarcate the boundaries as requested by the petitioner, after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks thereafter. No costs. 23-01-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The District Collector, Office Of Coimbatore District, Collectorate, Coimbatore District.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore South Municipal Corporation, Kuniamuthur, Coimbatore-641 008.

3.The Tahsildar (Land Survey), Office Of South Taluk, Coimbatore, Coimbatore - 641 018. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. rst

23-01-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arulmigu Siva Subramania Swami Bhananai Madalayam, Rep By Its President Managing Trustee, S.Natarajan, 43,Thottae Gowder Lane, Edayar Street, Coimbatore-641 001. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector, Office Of Coimbatore District. Collectorate, Coimbatore District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore South Municipal Corporation, Kuniamuthur, Coimbatore-641 008. 3.The Tahsildar (Land Survey), Office Of South Taluk, Coimbatore, Coimbatore - 641 018. (R3 Impleaded Vide Order Dated 10.12.2025 Made In WMP.27977/2024 In WP.20902/2024 By AQJ) Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 26.07.2021 and consequently directing the second respondent for demarcating the four boundaries of petitioner property in comprised of T.S.No.206, 207, 213, 214, 215 and 216 and has an extent of 33.09 sq.m, as per petitioner's application submitted to the second respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Ilayarani Ponraj For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Govt. Advocate For R1 and R3 Mr.Ferdinand, For R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.