VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S. Ss Cars Accessories v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 11953/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran , learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 20.01.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 21.11.2023 wherein the Petitioner has filed a reply dated

26.12.2023. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 20.01.2025.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 24.03.2026. Page2 of 6

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:- " The Petitioner is agreed to pay 25% of tax for remand"

¶7In view of the above, the case is remitted back to the Appellate Authority to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Appellate Authority shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. Page3 of 6

¶9It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶10In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Appellate Authority is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶11Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page4 of 6

¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Vv To The Assistant Commissioner (st) Gandhipuram assessment circle, Coimbatore 641 018 Page5 of 6

C.SARAVANAN, J. VV 01-04-2026 Page6 of 6 Page7 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.13044 and 13046 of 2026 M/s. SS CARS ACCESSORIES Rep By Its Partner P.Praveena No.392, Hundred Feet Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore 641012 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (st) Gandhipuram assessment circle, Coimbatore 641 018 ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records of the respondent herein in GSTIN-33AADFJ7469D1ZE/2017-18 and quash the proceeding dated 20.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Raveendran B For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate Page1 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.