R.Punithavathi v. The Inspector of Police

ORDER This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned XXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CBI cases relating to Banks and Financial Institution Scams), Chennai, in C.C.No.24 of 2013, vide judgment dated 09.01.2026.

¶2The conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner/ appellant, vide impugned judgment are as follows:- Under Section Sentence 120B r/w. 409, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC and Sections 13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act one

year

rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment. 420 of IPC one

year

rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment. 468 of IPC one

year

rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment. 471 r/w. 468 of IPC one

year

rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that this Court, vide orders all dated

06.02.2026 made in Crl.M.P.Nos.1556, 2007, 1772 & 2082 of 2026 in Crl.A.Nos.97, 138, 118 & 141 of 2026 respectively and vide order dated

02.03.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No.3886 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.240 of 2026, had suspended the sentence imposed on the co-accused persons. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had paid the entire fine amount imposed by the trial Court. He also submitted that there are arguable points in the criminal appeal, which is unlikely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and the petitioner/appellant has a fair chance of succeeding in the appeal and hence, the sentence imposed on the petitioner/appellant may be suspended.

¶4Per contra, the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent strongly opposed for suspending the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner stating that the petitioner, in collusion with other accused, by forging and falsifying the documents, cheated the bank and caused significant financial loss. He further submitted that the trial Court, after taking into consideration the oral and documentary evidence produced by the prosecution, rightly found the petitioner/appellant guilty and convicted and sentenced her, as stated above, which cannot be said to be erroneous. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of this petition.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking note of the fact that this Court had suspended the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the co-accused/A1, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of suspension of sentence to the petitioner, till the disposal of the criminal appeal, on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner/appellant shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Court for CBI Cases, Chennai;

(ii) The petitioner/appellant shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m., until the disposal of the criminal appeal.

(iii) If the petitioner is not able to appear before the trial Court on that day, she shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 of Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the Trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of her absence, as directed by the Trial Court.

¶7This criminal miscellaneous petition stands ordered accordingly.

25.03.2026 (2/2) skt To:

¶1The XXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, (CBI cases relating to Banks and Financial Institution Scams), Chennai.

¶2The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai. Shastri Bhavan.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. skt in Crl.A.No.325 of 2026 (2/2)

25.03.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.03.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Crl.A.No.325 of 2026 R.Punithavathi ...Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai. Shastri Bhavan. ...Respondent Criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS, seeking to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the appellant/accused by the order and judgment dated 09.01.2026 passed by the learned XXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CBI cases relating to Banks and Financial Institution Scams), Chennai in C.C.No.24 of 2013 pending the final disposal of the criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gopinath For Respondent : Mr.N.Baaskaran, Special Public Prosecutor