VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugam v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 March 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 7505/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

11.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 123 of BNS Act (Corresponding Section 328 of IPC) r/w 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that based on secret information, the respondent police found the petitioner in possession of 10 grams of ganja in his auto. Hence, the case was registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that the quantity involved is very small. The learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner has no previous cases and has been in incarceration since

11.03.2026. It is also submitted that he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for granting bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was found in possession of 10 grams ganja. It is also submitted that the quantity involved is not a commercial quantity. However, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.

¶6Considering the submission of the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that the quantity involved is not a commercial quantity and there are no previous cases pending against the petitioner. Hence, considering the period of Page3 of 5 incarceration undergone by the petitioner since 11.03.2026 and the totality of circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate -II, Tiruvannamalai District and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Page4 of 5 Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 25-03-2026 NSL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶2Sub Jail, Tiruvannamalai.

¶3The Inspector of Police, PEW Tiruvannamalai Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o7505oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o7505oofo2026 25-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Shanmugam ..Petitioners Vs The State Rep. by its Inspector of Police PEW Tiruvannamalai Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No. 47 of 226) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.47 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.E.Sathiyaraj For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.