VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Will (4) of D.Gnanaprakasam v. Devakumar Nicholas

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 July 2026
Bench
A.D.Maria Cleteauthor
Case no.
OP 355/2018

Judgment

O R D E R This Original Petition has been filed under Sections 232, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules, seeking grant of Letters of Administration, with the Will annexed, in respect of the estate of late D. Ganaprakasam, died on

28.08.2000.

¶2The petitioner claims that the deceased executed a registered Will dated 24.07.2000, registered as Document No.102 of 2000 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, T. Nagar. The petitioner has sought the grant on the basis that her husband, late Antony Chandrakumar, was a beneficiary under the Will and that, upon his subsequent death intestate on 18.07.2013, she became entitled to represent his interest.

¶3The petitioner, Margaret Rosalin, is the widow of Antony Chandrakumar, one of the sons of the testator. The first respondent, Page No.2 of 6 Devakumar Nicholas, and the second respondent, Josephin Ramiah, are respectively the son and daughter of late Antony Chandrakumar and the petitioner. The third respondent, G. Joseph Rajkumar, is the other son of the testator and the brother of Antony Chandrakumar.

¶4Notices were issued to the respondents. General notice was also effected by publication in the Tamil daily "Makkal Kural" dated 19.08.2022 and the English daily "Trinity Mirror" dated 26.08.2022. The third respondent was earlier set ex parte by order dated 28.11.2022.

¶5The petitioner examined herself as P.W.1 and marked the original Will dated 24.07.2000 as Ex.P1. The death certificates, affidavit of assets, paper publications and the legal heir certificate of Antony Chandrakumar were marked as Exs.P2 to P10. M. Elisiyus Fernando, one of the attesting witnesses to Ex.P1, was examined as P.W.2, and his identity document was marked as Ex.P11.

¶6While considering the entitlement of the petitioner to the grant, this Court finds that the petitioner herself is one of the attesting witnesses to Ex.P1. The beneficiary through whom the petitioner claims is her husband, Antony Chandrakumar. Page No.3 of 6

¶7Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provides that a Will shall not be rendered insufficiently attested merely because a benefit is given to an attesting witness or to the husband or wife of such witness. The provision, however, expressly declares that the bequest or appointment shall be void insofar as it concerns the attesting witness, the spouse of such witness, or any person claiming under either of them.

¶8Therefore, the circumstance that the petitioner attested Ex.P1 does not invalidate the entire Will. However, the bequest in favour of her husband, Antony Chandrakumar, is rendered void by operation of Section 67. The petitioner and respondents 1 and 2 claim only through Antony Chandrakumar and cannot derive a testamentary benefit under the bequest which has been rendered void by statute.

¶9The petition has been presented by the petitioner on the specific basis that she is the widow and legal representative of Antony Chandrakumar, the beneficiary under the Will. Since the bequest in favour of Antony Chandrakumar is rendered void under Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the basis on which the petitioner seeks Letters of Administration does not survive. Page No.4 of 6

¶10Accordingly, O.P.No.355 of 2018 is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected applications, if any, stand closed.

23.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sts To:

¶1Devakumar Nicholas, S/o Late Antony Chandrakumar, No.54/129, Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017

¶2Josephin Ramiah, D/o Late Antony Chandrakumar, No.54/129, Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017

¶3G.Joseph Rajkumar, S/o Late D.Gnanaprakasam, No.54. Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 Page No.5 of 6 DR.A.D.MARIAoCLETE,oJ. sts Orderomadeoin O.P.No.355oofo2018 Dated:

23.07.2026 PageoNo.6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE O.P.No.355 of 2018 Margaret Rosalin W/o Late Antony Chandrakumar No.54/129, Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 ..Petitioner Vs 1. Devakumar Nicholas, S/o Late Antony Chandrakumar, No.54/129, Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 2. Josephin Ramiah, D/o Late Antony Chandrakumar, No.54/129, Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 3. G.Joseph Rajkumar, S/o Late D.Gnanaprakasam, No.54. Kodambakkam High Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 ..Respondents PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Sections 232, 255 and 276 of Indian Succession Act 39 of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules, praying that the Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the petitioner as the daughter-in-law and wife of the legatee named under the Page No.1 of 6 Will dated 14.07.2000 of the said deceased having effect limited throughout the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents: No appearance ***

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.