P.Rajendran v. The Secretary

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the fifth respondent and perused the records.

¶2The petitioner, by the writ petition, has assailed the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned proceedings dated 04.05.2021 whereby the respondents sought to recover an amount of Rs.3,51,966/- claiming the same to be excess drawn amount to which the petitioner is not entitled to.

¶3Admittedly, the petitioner was working as Multipurpose Health Supervisor. Further, the impugned proceedings itself records that the petitioner having retired from service on 31.03.2020 and that the position in which, the petitioner had retired from service falls under Ground "C" category of employment. It is a settled position of law that in respect of amount paid to the employees in Group "C" and "D" is concerned, no recovery can be made, more particularly, after having retired from service.[State of Punjab and others V. Rafiq Masih(White Washers) and others reported in 2015 (4) SCC 334]

¶4This Court in various decisions like in W.P.Nos.33040, 25149, 10907, 30344 and 9243 of 2019 applying the aforesaid law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in respect of employees falling under Group "C" and "D", has held that no recovery can be made, as the excess amount paid to an employee is without the fault of the said employee.

¶5Even in the facts of the present case, it is not shown to this Court that the excess payment made to the petitioner is on account of any misrepresentation by him during the period mentioned in the impugned order.

¶6In view of the above, for the reasons recorded by this Court in earlier orders (supra), this Court is of the view that the impugned order cannot be sustained.

¶7Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

08.01.2026 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To

¶1The Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶2The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai – 06.

¶3The Deputy Director of Medical Services, Namakkal.

¶4The Block Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Center, Vinaiteerthapuram, Namakkal District.

¶5The Branch Manager, O/o. The Principal Accountant General (A & E), 361, Anna Salai, Chennai – 18. T. VINOD KUMAR

, J.

dh

08.01.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos.12584 to 12586 of 2021 P.Rajendran ... Petitioner vs 1. The Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2. The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai – 06. 3. The Deputy Director of Medical Services, Namakkal. 4. The Block Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Center, Vinaiteerthapuram, Namakkal District. 5. The Branch Manager, O/o. The Principal Accountant General (A & E), 361, Anna Salai, Chennai – 18. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the proceedings in R.No.306/A3/2019 dated 04.05.2021 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Gowtham for Mr.S.C.Vishwanth For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippusulthan Government Advocate for R1 to R4 : Mr.V.Vijayshankar Standing Counsel for R5