VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Indus Agencies v. The State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 12248/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.

¶2With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.

¶3This is the second round of litigation before this Court. Previously, the petitioner suffered an adverse order dated 29.08.2024, which was challenged in a writ petition connected with batch matters in W.P.Nos.17184 of 2024 etc, on the ground of limitation. After the issue was answered by this Court, the case was taken up for fresh adjudication, which has culminated in the impugned order.

¶4Pursuant to the remand order, the petitioner filed a reply on

25.08.2025. However, it is noticed that the said reply was not relevant for the Assessment Year 2019-2020 and relevant to the Assessment Years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023.

¶5It is in this background, the demand was confirmed for the impugned tax period 2019-2020.

¶6As such, there is no scope for interfering with the impugned order, as no procedural irregularity has been noticed that would warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶7The impugned order cannot be said to be perverse, as the petitioner failed to file a proper reply to the notice, despite the case having been remitted back by this Court in the earlier round of litigation.

¶8The limitation for filing an appeal would have expired on

11.03.2026. The present writ petition has been filed on 17.03.2026.

¶9To balance the interest of the parties, I am inclined to give liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, within a period of 15 days from today.

¶10If the petitioner files such an appeal within such time, the Appellate Authority shall dispose of the same on merits after hearing the petitioner, without reference to limitation.

¶11This writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

30.03.2026 raja Note: Issue order copy on 30.03.2026 To The State Tax Officer, Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Arisipalayam Circle, 4th Floor, Commercial Taxes Office Building, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 7.

C.SARAVANAN, J. raja

30.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.13377 & 13379 of 2026 M/s. Indus Agencies Rep. by its Partner Abdul Khadar Jailani J 43, K.M Complex Three Road Pallapatty, Suramangalam Main Road, Salem, Tamil Nadu – 636 009. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Arisipalayam Circle, 4th Floor, Commercial Taxes Office Building, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 7. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the rectification Order in GSTIN: 33AACF18339N1Z0/2019-20 dated 12.11.2025 along with the Consequential proceeding Summary of rectification of Order vide Form GST-08 with Ref : ZD33112521525208U dated 12.11.2025 for the Period 2019-20 to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.