- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 April 2026
- Bench
- S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP 14019/2026
Judgment
O R D E R [Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,] The writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 07.03.2026 issued under Section 131 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 ("the Panchayat Act").
¶2The Block Development Officer / Special Officer, identified encroachments in Thottivalasu Panchayat and issued a notice calling upon the encroachers to vacate the encroachments and hand over vacant possession to the Panchayat, failing which further appropriate action will be initiated. The said show cause notice cannot provide any cause for instituting proceedings. That apart, the Block Development Officer, on receipt of the explanation from the encroachers has to consider the same and form a final opinion regarding the encroachments and file a report to the jurisdictional Page Nos.2/4 Tahsildar for initiation of enforcement action under the provisions of "the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)" {hereinafter "1905 Act" for the sake of brevity}, if the encroachers fail to vacate the encroachments from the Panchayat property. Therefore, the impugned notice would not provide any cause for the present writ petition.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that explanations have already been submitted. If so, the Block Development Officer shall consider the same and submit a report to the Tahsildar, if any encroachment is identified and on receipt of the report, the Tahsildar shall initiate enforcement action by following the procedure as contemplated under 1905 Act for eviction of encroachments. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶4With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.)
15.04.2026 Index : Yes Speaking order / Non-speaking order mk Page Nos.3/4 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J., and K. SURENDER, J., mk To
¶1The District Collector Office of District Collector Namakkal.
¶2The Tahsildar Raispuram Namakkal District.
¶3The Special Officer Block Development Officer (Rural) Thottiyavalasu Panchayat Vannanthur Taluk, Namakkal District.
15.04.2026 Page Nos.4/4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and W.M.P.Nos.15280 & 15281 of 2026 Vasanthakumari W/o.Jalanthar ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Office of District Collector Namakkal. 2. The Tahsildar Raispuram Namakkal District. 3. The Special Officer Block Development Officer (Rural) Thottiyavalasu Panchayat Vannanthur Taluk, Namakkal District. 4. N.Kumar S/o.Narayanan … Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to notice of third Page Nos.1/4 respondent dated 07.03.2026 in Na.Ka.No.01/2026, quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to initiate a proceeding under the provision of land encroachment 1905 in respect of land in Survey Nos.93/3 and 94/2 after fixing the boundary stone for patta land of petitioner in Survey Nos.93/3 an extent of 0.60.00 Hec and 94/2 an extent of 0.10/05 Hec. By the 2nd respondent in pursuant to the application dated 10.03.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Elango For Respondent : Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.