VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Sridharan v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 15230/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to update and mutate the revenue records including the land ownership details for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.09.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2According to the petitioner, eventhough FMB sketch was rectified by the respondent for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, till date, in the revenue records, the same has not been updated. The petitioner has given a representation on 06.09.2025 to the respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

¶3Mr. D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner's representation, seeking for updation and mutation of the revenue records including the land ownership details pursuant to the correction of the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 06.09.2025, seeking for updation and mutation of the revenue records including the land ownership details pursuant to the correction of the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 28-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk, Bharathi Salai,Phase-II, Nolambur, Chennai. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

28-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. S.Sridharan S/o.G.Sankaran, Plot No.24,2nd Street, Venkateswara Nagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai-87. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk, Bharathi Salai,Phase-II, Nolambur, Chennai. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondent to update and mutate the revenue records including the land ownership details .E No.10 (1) Chitta (Patta), A Register, relating to Survey number 201/13,(old S.No.201/2) Valasaravakkam Village, Maduravoyal taluk, as 1855 Sq.ft equal to 0-1.72 ares instead of 0-1.50 ares consistent with the title deed of the petitioner and Field Measurement Plan uploaded in the Government Portal and pass. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.