- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 July 2026
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP 21549/2026
Judgment
ORDER In relation to outward supplies purportedly made by the petitioner, Input Tax Credit (ITC) was passed on to the alleged recipient of goods. In relation thereto, pursuant to show cause notice dated 28.06.2025, impugned order dated Page2 of 4
26.12.2025 was issued imposing penalty under Section 122 of applicable GST enactments.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that penalty was wrongly imposed in spite of the petitioner submitting relevant documents to establish that an outward supplies of goods was indeed made by the petitioner.
¶3Mr. R. Sreedhar, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry), appears on behalf of the respondent. He points out that show cause notice dated
28.06.2025, which culminated in the order impugned herein, was earlier challenged in W.P.No.1416 of 2026 and that said writ petition was disposed of by recording that a statutory appeal is available in relation to the penalty proceedings initiated under the show cause notice. Without disclosing this fact, he submits that the writ petition has been filed.
¶4Order dated 30.01.2026 in W.P.No.1416 of 2026 relates to show cause notice dated 28.06.2025. Said show cause notice was the basis of order dated
26.12.2025. Therefore, the filing of W.P.No.1416 of 2026 ought to have been disclosed by the petitioner. In any event, on perusal of the impugned order dated
26.12.2025, it is clear that penalty was imposed on the ground that the petitioner failed to establish outward supplies in relation to which ITC was passed on to the recipient concerned. These are matters involving disputed question of facts Page3 of 4 and appreciation of evidence. The petitioner has approached this Court within the period of limitation for lodging a statutory appeal. Therefore, a case is made out to exclude the time taken in prosecuting this writ petition. If an appeal were to be filed by the petitioner within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the appellate authority is directed to receive and dispose of such appeal on merits subject to fulfilment of pre-deposit requirements without going into the question of limitation.
¶5The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 07-07-2026 Index : Yes/No KJ To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Goods Division -1, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Puducherry, 100 Feet Road, Ellaipillaichavady, Puducherry 605 005. Page4 of 4
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ and WMP.No.23324 of 2026 07-07-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP.No.23324 of 2026 M/s. Industrial Hardware Stores No.152 Kamaraj Salai Saram, Puducherry 605013. ..Petitioner Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Goods Division -1, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Puducherry, 100 Feet Road, Ellaipillaichavady, Puducherry 605 005. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for records of the Impugned Order-in-Original dated 26.12.2025 having the Reference No. 34AAAFI1434L1ZM/DCTO-GD-I/2018-19 dated 26.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. Sathyakumar M For Respondent: Mr. R. Sreedhar, AGP (Puducherry)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.