- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 11744/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. The petitioner seeks for early disposal of the petitioner's application dated
19.02.2026 filed with the 1st respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007, seeking to take action against the respondents 5 and 6.
2.Mr.N.Naveenkumar, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1, 3 & 4. Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. The 5th Page2 of 5 respondent is the daughter of the petitioner and 6th respondent is the son-in-law, against whom the petitioner has filed the application under Senior Citizen Act, 2007.
3.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued to the 4th respondent to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's application filed under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 and by adhering to the Principles of natural justice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Since no adverse orders are passed as against the respondents 5 and 6 in this Writ Petition, notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with by this Court.
4.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's application dated 19.02.2026 filed under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act, after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 and by conducting proper enquiry and by adhering to the Principles of natural justice, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of Page3 of 5 this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To
¶1The District Collector Chennai District Chennai 600 001.
¶2The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai police, Vepery, Chennai.
¶3The District Social Welfare officer District Social Welfare office, North Chennai, Chennai District, Chennai 600 001.
¶4The Revenue Divisional officer Chennai Central Division, Chennai 600 010, Page4 of 5
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA and W.M.P.No.12805 of 2026 27-03-2026 Page5 of 5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.12805 of 2026 Mrs. Sandra Margaret Dupratt ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chennai District Chennai 600 001. 2. The Commissioner of Police Greater chennai police, Vepery, Chennai. 3. The District Social Welfare officer District Social Welfare office, North Chennai, Chennai District, Chennai 600 001. 4. The Revenue Divisional officer Chennai central Division, Chennai 600 010. 5. Sanya 6. Rajinikumar ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5 PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th Respondent to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2026 as per the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and the Tamil Nadu maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 by giving sufficient notices and opportunities to the respondents 3 and 4 and conclude the same within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ilayaperumal For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Naveenkumar Government Advocate (For R1,R3 & R4) Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (For R2)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.