VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Amala Das @ v. Anita Jeyachandini

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 March 2025
Bench
R. Suresh Kumarauthor, A.D.Maria Clete
Case no.
CMA 253/2018

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R. Suresh KumarFollow A.D.Maria Clete

Judgment

J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous appeal has been directed against the order passed by the learned IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai dated 25.10.2017 in O.P.No.2650 of 2012.

¶2Before the trial Court, the husband filed the said OP seeking for divorce under Section 10(1)(ix) of the Divorce Act, 1869 praying for dissolving the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent, i.e., appellant and the respondent herein dated 29.09.1995 on the ground of desertion.

¶3The trial Court after having gone through the merits of the case as well as the evidence adduced before it has ultimately come to the conclusion that, the petition was deserved to be dismissed, accordingly, it was dismissed through the impugned order. As against which, this appeal has been filed by the appellant / husband.

¶4When this appeal is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant / husband and the respondent / wife have stated that, during the pendency of this appeal, there has been settlement between the parties which in fact has been concluded and to that extent, a memo of compliance dated 04.03.2025 has been filed and also a memo of compromise signed by both parties dated 31.01.2025 also has been filed.

¶5As per the memo of compromise, the appellant agreed to pay a sum of Rs.4,50,00,000/- (Rupees Four Crores and Fifty Lakhs only) as full and final settlement towards the respondent's maintenance and permanent alimony apart from the money already paid to the respondent.

¶6This money has been paid by way of cheque at more than one time, that has also been mentioned in the compromise memo. The respondent / wife also acknowledged the receipt of the entire alimony and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has confirmed it.

¶7It is also agreed upon between the parties that in view of the said settlement, they are willing to part away by consent and accordingly, they want to file necessary petition under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869 before the Court below.

¶8It is also the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the respondent / wife and children are in abroad, they cannot frequently visit India and therefore at the time of filing and at the time of hearing, the trial Court may permit the respondent / wife to appear through Video Conferencing to confirm that such a consent for divorce was given by the respondent in filing Section 10A petition before the trial Court.

¶9We have considered the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for both sides and have gone through the contents of the memo of compromise dated 31.01.2025 and memo of compliance dated 04.03.2025.

¶10In view of the said settlement reached between the parties and by recording the memo of compromise as well as the memo of compliance dated

31.01.2025 and 04.03.2025 respectively, we are inclined to pass the following orders while disposing of this civil miscellaneous appeal:

(i) that the order impugned passed by the trial Court dismissing the said OP filed by the appellant / husband seeking divorce is set aside.

(ii) As a sequel, the parties are permitted to approach the trial Court to file a petition under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869. At the time of filing such petition, the physical presence of the respondent / wife shall be dispensed with.

iii) After entertaining the petition, at the time of verification to verify that the consent has been given by the respondent / wife also for granting divorce under Section 10A of the of the Divorce Act, 1869, the trial Court shall permit the respondent / wife to appear through Video Conferencing as she is in abroad and cannot immediately come over to India.

(iv) On completion of such process, by waiving six months statutory period provided under Section 10(A)(2) of the Divorce Act, 1869 by taking into account the memo of comprise which has been recorded herein, shall grant divorce by way of mutual consent within the meaning of Section 10(A) of the Divorce Act, 1869. The memo of compromise as well as memo of compliance shall form part of this order.

¶11To the terms indicated above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Registry is directed to issue a copy of this order along with the copy of the memo of compromise and memo of compliance as addendum to the order by 10.03.2025. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (R.S.K., J.) (A.D.M.C., J.)

06.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji Note: Issue order copy by 10.03.2025. To

¶1The learned IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

¶2The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Chennai.

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. and

A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. vji

06.03.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE Amala Das @ V.G.S Rajesh Amaladas ... Appellant -Vs- Anita Jeyachandini ... Respondent PRAYER : Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts, Act 1984 against the order and decreetal order of the learned IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai dated 25.10.2017 made in O.P.No.2650 of 2012. For Appellant : Mr.N.Alagu Narayanan for M/s.RRN Legal For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ramesh

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.